Lion Cipher Lab

Catch circular reporting before it inflates your confidence (rebuild who copied whom)

Why it matters

When eleven vendor blogs, feeds and digests all say the same group is behind an intrusion, it feels like overwhelming agreement. Often it is one original investigation, copied, re-blogged, aggregated and copied again, sometimes without a single citation. Count the copies as confirmation and your confidence climbs while your evidence stays flat; worse, anyone who can plant one claim in one widely-read source can manufacture a consensus for free. Intelligence standards have warned about this for decades, and commercial threat intelligence makes it easier, because publishing is cheap and…

What you'll learn

Steps in this lab

  1. The trap: eleven reports, how many sources?
  2. What the analytic standards ask of you
  3. Open a terminal, check Python, make a folder
  4. Build the corpus, with the answer key hidden in a separate file
  5. Write the shared helpers: refang, compare, resolve to roots
  6. Count what the citations admit to
  7. Refang before you compare, or copies hide in plain sight
  8. Sweep the threshold and grade it against the hidden truth
  9. Ship a policy, not a threshold: auto-merge, review band, unknown
  10. Resolve the grey band the way an analyst would
  11. The honest limits of this method
  12. When to do this, why it works, and how a pro does it better

Open the full interactive lab →